nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access
From: Pete Ashdown <pashdown () xmission com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 10:14:12 -0700 (MST)
Deepak Jain said once upon a time:
UUNET doesn't own dedicated single-circuit copper to people's houses.Okay, now lets talk about a wide-scale xDSL implementation using a reasonably well known POP architecture like UUNet's. If xDSL can only run about 18kft end-to-end, to service a wide metro area like Washington, D.C. one would either have to have a POP within every 6 mile radius (fed by conventional circuits) or backhaul the data (by conventional circuit) to their POP. Is this correct, if not, what am I missing?
The fact that phone companies like US West are tying the local loop DSL circuits into their ATM network. All UUnet or another provider needs to do to provide DSL service is be tied into the same ATM network.
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Greg Simpson (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access ^Faust^ (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Nathan Stratton (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Dalvenjah FoxFire (Jan 23)
- RE: Microsoft offering xDSL access David Lemson (Jan 26)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Sharif Torpis (Jan 24)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Geoff White (Jan 24)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Stephen Balbach (Jan 23)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Pete Ashdown (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access HawkeWerks Multimedia (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 23)
- RE: Microsoft offering xDSL access David Lemson (Jan 26)
- Re: Microsoft offering xDSL access Henry Linneweh (Jan 23)