Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement

[John Curran <jcurran () bbnplanet com>]

At 04:14 PM 08/24/1998 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

> The net effect is that the transit provider is double-dipping, 
> and it costs the receiver twice to receive the data. 
>
> Somehow this doesn't seem to be very attractive to me. 

You're paying half the cost currently, the sender (presuming
they're transit or a relatively balanced peer) is paying the 
other half.

/John