nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMURF amplifier block list
From: Aaron Beck <abeck () falcon org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 08:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a similar but more profound effect. Anyone who actually uses a .255 address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.
the problem with that thinking, of course, is going to crop up when you encounter /23's and greater. -- Aaron
Current thread:
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list, (continued)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Randy Bush (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Jason L. Weisberger (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Dean Anderson (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Forrest W. Christian (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Alex P. Rudnev (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Forrest W. Christian (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Michael Shields (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Brett Frankenberger (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Stephen Sprunk (Apr 13)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Aaron Beck (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Charley Kline (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Stephen Sprunk (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Stephen Sprunk (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Karl Denninger (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Aaron Beck (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list Stephen Sprunk (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list - READ THIS Karl Denninger (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list - READ THIS Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 14)
- Re: SMURF amplifier block list - READ THIS Mark Milhollan (Apr 14)