nanog mailing list archives

Re: SMURF amplifier block list


From: Aaron Beck <abeck () falcon org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 08:49:04 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Stephen Sprunk wrote:

Then again, filtering any packets to or from x.x.x.255 would have a
similar but more profound effect.  Anyone who actually uses a .255
address for a host is asking for trouble anyways.

the problem with that thinking, of course, is going to crop up when you
encounter /23's and greater.

-- Aaron



Current thread: