nanog mailing list archives

Re: smurf's attack...


From: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn () bestweb net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:59:56 -0400

At 2:45 PM -0500 9/5/97, Jon Green wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:24:58 -0400, jordyn () bestweb net writes:

We're also using the following extended access list (along with
anti-spoofing filters) to prevent smurf attacks from originating from our
network:

access-list XXX deny ip any 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0


Folks, this is a bad idea.  There are lots of completely valid IP
addresses out there that end in .255.  True, most of them that
end in .255 ARE broadcast addresses, but if people implement this
kind of filtering on a large scale, it really breaks classless IP.

Eep, this is true.  (Stupid me).

Haven't had any complaints yet from users unable to access anything yet,
but so much for making the 'Net slightly safer from this crap.

Jordyn

|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|Jordyn A. Buchanan                    mailto:jordyn () bestweb net |
|Bestweb Corporation                      http://www.bestweb.net |
|Senior System Administrator                     +1.914.271.4500 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|




Current thread: