nanog mailing list archives

Re: Packets from net 10 (no, not the lyrics)


From: Mohamad Eljazzar <eljazzar () ns utk edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 12:29:00 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 bmanning () ISI EDU wrote:


What about providers that use portions of the private address space on
their network (up to and including the client's serial interface)?

Mohamad

On Tue, 23 Sep 1997 bmanning () ISI EDU wrote:

Should I be filtering all reserved space at my border, or would
it be reasonable for me to expect the big guys not to take packets
with clearly inappropriate source addresses?

  Yes you should. (and with kudos to Andrew)


[ access lists deleted ]



      The operative phrase here is border. 
      That means ASN border, i.e. where you BGP
      peer with others.  At the provider/subscriber
      interface, within your IGP, using RFC 1918 space
      is ok.

I agree if BGP is running between the customer and the provider.  However,
if:

        - both the provider *and* the customer are using the same private
          address space

   *and*

        - the provider assigns the p2p link addresses from that same
          address space (according to its own subnetting plan)

the question becomes:  where do you apply the filters?  Is it safe for the
provider to assume, in the first place, that its use of private addresses
should extend to customer networks? 

Mohamad



Current thread: