nanog mailing list archives

Re: Traffic Engineering


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 16:02:48 -0400

On Wed, Sep 17, 1997 at 12:23:38PM -0700, Josh Beck wrote:
Are there any major potholes in this theory that I'm missing?

      A big problem here is that ISPs differentiate themselves based on
who they buy bandwidth from. An ISP that has a T1 to CRL, say, benefits
greatly when a larger competitor gets a T1 to CRL as well, but the larger
competitor doesn't benefit if they already have multiple T1s and T3s to
the larger backbones themselves. A better idea is a miniature NAP for the
ISPs in each large metropolitan area for exchanging local traffic.

Forgive me, I guess I didn't phrase it well enough, as that's what I
was trying to suggest.  Although, I suppose, the exchanging, and the
access to the backbones are two different things, the latter may well
be more salable than the former, even though the former is better for
the net at large.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "People propose, science studies, technology
Tampa Bay, Florida          conforms."  -- Dr. Don Norman      +1 813 790 7592


Current thread: