nanog mailing list archives
Re: too many routes
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: 10 Sep 1997 21:16:22 -0400
Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se> writes:
Sprintlink does not use route-servers today, the RP in the GSR is probably enough for a while, right now it's not very busy.
After convergence the CPU in any distributed switching framework should be a function of the routing algorithms and the amount of background noise. However, to close off the nit-pick, the RP in the GSR seems to perform spectacularly well even under unusually heavy routing load. This is great as long as there is no need to replace the RP before a replacement is technologically feasible... Sean.
Current thread:
- RE: too many routes, (continued)
- RE: too many routes Sanjay Dani (Sep 10)
- Re: too many routes Sean M. Doran (Sep 10)
- Message not available
- Re: too many routes Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 11)
- Re: too many routes Sean M. Doran (Sep 11)
- Re: too many routes Michael Dillon (Sep 11)
- NATs and addressing Sean M. Doran (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: too many routes Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 11)
- Re: too many routes Sean M. Doran (Sep 10)
- Re: too many routes David Mercer (Sep 11)
- RE: too many routes Sanjay Dani (Sep 10)
- Re: too many routes Sean M. Doran (Sep 10)
- Re: too many routes Sean M. Doran (Sep 11)
- Re: too many routes Richard Irving (Sep 11)
- ATM (was Re: too many routes) Sean M. Doran (Sep 11)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Vadim Antonov (Sep 11)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Richard Irving (Sep 11)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Michael Dillon (Sep 11)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Vadim Antonov (Sep 11)
- Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes) Geoff Huston (Sep 14)