nanog mailing list archives
Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () pathfinder com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 11:08:12 -0500
Bob Allisat is, I'm sorry to say, a well-known Net-kook. I remember him infesting a bunch of Usenet newsgroups. Now that he appears to be on nanog, the best strategy might be to ignore him. -Declan At 07:19 -0800 11/25/97, Tom Glover wrote:
Oh, Christ. Not again. This never ending argument about BIND doesn't have any place on NANOG. Please take it somewhere else. On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Bob Allisat wrote:Hmmm... A question we may be asking about you, your BIND monopoly and the way you've been a co-conspirator in all these monopoly moves. Seems like Paulie doesn't want anyone in his sandbox. Can Paulie spell "anti-trust"?
------------------------- Declan McCullagh Time Inc. The Netly News Network Washington Correspondent http://netlynews.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund, (continued)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund George Herbert (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Bob Allisat (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund George Herbert (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Martin Hannigan (Nov 26)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Randy Bush (Nov 26)
- Subject lines (was Re: Eugene Kashpureff's...) David Carmean (Nov 26)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund John A. Tamplin (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Tom Glover (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Karl Denninger (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Declan McCullagh (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Marc Hurst (Nov 25)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund John Curran (Nov 24)
- Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund Karl Denninger (Nov 25)