nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 97 15:17 PST
Take Russian Internet for example: five largest ISPs all have separate dedicated links to _different_ European and North American backbones. This seems to be a typical picture all around the world. European connectivity is particularly convoluted.
For years, Thailand had for separate competing connections to AlterNet. I loved it, as it demonstrated a minimum market price of ego. Of course, there are no analogs to this in North American locales. Right. randy
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phillip Vandry (Nov 05)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John A. Tamplin (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Gary E. Miller (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Winfried Haug (Nov 09)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Havard . Eidnes (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Paul A Vixie (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) bmanning (Nov 01)