nanog mailing list archives
Re: New MAE-EAST
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:00:01 -0600
Just try to bring up another point. Anyone has thought about Gigabit ethernet switches? Prominet's Cajun switch has a 45GB backplane. Supports up to 24 full-duplex Gigabit ethernet ports or 120 full-duplex fastethernet ports, or a mix of both. The price is also very reasonable.
There was a BOF at the last NANOG about the Digital version, Gigaswitch/Ethernet. However, it wasn't clear what the switch did when congested. There was some mention of IEEE congestion control, but that seems to use some sort of back pressure on the sender. I don't think that is what you want in an exchange point. A single congested egress port shouldn't block an ingress port at an exchange point. Especially if you are going to mix different types and speeds of ports. There was also some concern about the amount of buffering in the switch. And finally, when fully maxed out with ports the switch is oversubscribed, but that could be managed by only using two port cards rather than four port cards. And for a MAE-East size exchange, you will still quickly be faced with the problem tying two or more switches together, which makes the congestion control issue even more critical if it happens on a port between switches. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
Current thread:
- Re: New MAE-EAST, (continued)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Steven Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Al Roethlisberger (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Naiming Shen (Nov 05)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Paul D. Robertson (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST John A. Tamplin (Nov 06)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Kent W. England (Nov 08)
- Message not available
- Re: New MAE-EAST Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 08)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: New MAE-EAST Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)