nanog mailing list archives

Re: Thoughts on spam control


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () inorganic5 fdt net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:42:56 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Patrick Lynch wrote:

wpoison:  Traps e-mail web crawlers, but what is to stop it from trapping
          other web crawlers that altavista, webcrawler, excite, yahoo and
          other people use?

It uses an anti-robot meta tag:
<meta name="ROBOTS" content="NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW">
so the idea is genuine, well written robots will stop after hitting it
once, but the address harvestors hopefully have no concept of the above
tag and keep hitting.

I downloaded it last night and really like the idea.

          It boasts that it can provide an almost infinite number of bogus
          e-mail addresses as well as hyperlinks.  (these hyperlinks point
          directly back to the same page)  Why would you want to trap a web
          crawler on your site, using your bandwidth and resources almost
          indefinitely?

I thought about this almost immediately.  First thing I did was hack in
a delay.  If they're going to get caught in an infinite loop of bogus
addresses, I don't want them "benchmarking" my web server by pounding on
it.  I also added in a further wrinkle to make the URL's it gives you look
a lot more different, so it doesn't appear to be just sending you right
back to the same site and script.  Have a look at
http://fdt.net/cgi-bin/wpoison
Note...for real use, it's probably a good idea to not call it wpoison,
lest the collectors clue in and ignore URLs with wpoison in them.  I have
a number of hard links to it, so it can be called by other names...now
that I think about it, it might be nice to shuffle those as well.

Deadbolt(tm):  This filters out known e-mail spammers, from an automatically
               update-able lists, provided by E-scrub Technologies.  What
               happens when a majority of ISPs are using a filter like this and a
               legitimate e-mail address is accidently put in the list?
               That e-mail address would then be denied by a majority of the
               ISPs.

I looked at this several months ago.  It seemed slow and klunky and a bit
more complicated than the average user could handle.  I like the idea
though.

------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis () fdt net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
 Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____



Current thread: