nanog mailing list archives
Re: connectivity outside the US
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 11:18:51 -0700
smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran) wrote:
Examining this a bit more closely, since undersea capacity is terribly expensive, when there is adequate capacity available to a large aggregate of sites people want to get to, there will be an obvious market for access to that capacity.
Actually, i do not understand why undersea capacity is so expensive. Cable is more expensive, yes; but the paths are much straighter, and there's no need to purchase rights of ways (except for shore-side strips). There's no need to dig trenches -- you just drop the cable off the boat. I guess the real problem with undersea capacity is more in the fact that it was always considered a low-volume service (which it is, in terms of voice traffic); so there's no many competitive providers, and small-quantity pricing. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: connectivity outside the US Vadim Antonov (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Jesse Caulfield (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Brian Horvitz (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Chris Whittenburg (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Daniel McRobb (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Perry E. Metzger (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: connectivity outside the US Barry Raveendran Greene (May 31)
- RE: connectivity outside the US Barry Raveendran Greene (May 31)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Sean M. Doran (May 31)
- RE: connectivity outside the US Sean M. Doran (May 31)
- RE: connectivity outside the US Barry Raveendran Greene (May 31)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: connectivity outside the US Jesse Caulfield (May 31)