nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure?
From: Sanjay Dani <sanjay () professionals com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 13:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
2 - Are they pulling CIX peering? (Can that rtr get any more overloaded? :)
That is just an overloaded SMDS connection, not the router itself.
Last I heard, when the CIX moves locations, AGIS, MCI, UUNET, and Sprint will all be leaving the CIX.
For those who are not aware: --MCI stopped advertising their routes to the CIX router a few months ago. --Sprint is supposed to have stopped peering with CIX yesterday (I haven't verified this yet) --UUnet has indicated they will be leaving CIX These are my observations as a CIX member, not an official CIX statement. Sanjay. --------------------------------------------------------------- Web Professionals, Inc. 20370 Town Center Lane, Suite 245 +1 408-865-0899 Cupertino CA 95014 USA http://web.professionals.com --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure? Mark E Larson (May 02)
- Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure? Tim Flavin (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure? Scott Yoneyama (May 02)
- Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure? Sanjay Dani (May 02)
- Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure? Bill Unsworth (May 07)