nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing
From: John Curran <jcurran () bbnplanet com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 12:09:15 -0500
At 1:29 3/29/97, David Stoddard wrote:
The inference here is that by creating a costly new bureaucracy, all our problems will go away.
The inference is that we can have IP address allocations being made by a relatively nimble non-profit if we take the steps to establish such now. There is a very real difference between a large for-profit company working under the goverment cooperative agreement and a small standalone operation running under member goverance. I don't think creating ARIN solves the world's problems, but I do think it provides a solid path forward for IP administration in a very uncertain world. /John - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing John Curran (Mar 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing NetSurfer (Mar 30)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing David R. Conrad (Mar 30)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing Randy Bush (Mar 31)
- Re: ARIN is *NOT* A Good Thing NetSurfer (Mar 31)