nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Big Squeeze


From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () netrail net>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 14:42:51 -0500 (EST)

On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:

It's the renumbering part that I think gives people the most
heartburn... By the time you get "big enough" to warrent your
own block, you've got at least 32 ClassCs of which, I'm betting,
at least 28 are "given" to LAN-connected customers. This is
a _major_ headache not only for the ISP to go thru but also a
major headache to force your customers to go thru. That is, what
I think, is what really is most painful; that by the time you
are big enough to have your own block, you're too big to want
to renumber: Catch 22

Yes, but as a smaller ISP you can offer much better service, and help you
customers renumber. Yes I of all people know it is a _major_ headache, but
it can be done, and there are ways to do it. 

Just because it is a "_major_ headache", is not a good reason to add a
route to the global table, or have the nic give you a bigger block then
you need at that time.



Nathan Stratton                                President, NetRail,Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone   (888)NetRail                           NetRail, Inc.
Fax     (404)522-1939                          230 Peachtree Suite 500
WWW     http://www.netrail.net/                Atlanta, GA 30303
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about 
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."           Matthew 6:34

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: