nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Backbone Index
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 21:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:
I don't think I'm missing it. I think I'm disagreeing with it in as nice and nonconfrontational a way as I can given the crappy personality I have
apparently your definition of nonconfrontational includes calling people morons. i think i will expand my definition of "editor" to include clueless network engineer wannabes.
to work from. Splitting hairs from here to infinity on what "network" means and what the world wide web is departs rather widely from my mission here, so I'm giving it short shrift. If you don't know how ping and traceroute vary from data flows, I can't help much there either.
since you obviously don't know a thing about how things like peering, NAPs, IP routing, and all the other components of network engineering work, i this it humorous.
If you want to draw a line of demarcation between a network and its performance, and a web server and its performance, you're free to do so. I just probably won't buy into it.
and we probably wouldn't either. but since that isn't what anyone is doing, how is this relevant?
On the actual concept that changing all the web servers will move the numbers: It might. It might not. I would probably bet at this point that there will be a lot of that going on among the non-moron crowd. I'm kind of hoping for it anyway. And then we'll see if the numbers move. My sense is that they will move some, and not as much as most seem to think. But it's true it could go the other way and be dramatic. I'm open to whatever results derive.
so you are hoping backbone providers move their own home page web servers in order to skew a severely limited and obviously bogus benchmark? if it is as easy as that to change the results, don't you think perhaps there is something radically wrong with your methodology? wouldn't that seem to indicate this so-called benchmark isn't really testing what it purports to? if keystone just said "we are testing how long it takes to download a random page from provider home pages" then there wouldn't furor. instead, the claim is made that this somehow indicates the overall health and performance of provider backbones. that is utter nonsense.
Jack Rickard ----------From: Justin W. Newton <justin () priori net> To: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>; Stan Barber<sob () academ com>; vaden () texoma net; SEAN () SDG DRA COM; nanog () merit eduSubject: Re: Internet Backbone Index Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:50 PM Jack, I believe that you are missing the point that measuring web server response time is /not/ the equivalent of measuring backbone performance. At 12:45 PM 6/27/97 -0600, Jack Rickard wrote:They could be. The attempt is to factor that out. ALL measuring agents applied to ALL the backbones. And all contributed more or less equallytothe end numbers. If a particular agent ran on a Commodore 64 with aklugedcopy of KA9Q, and another agent ran on an Sun Solaris, both resultswouldgo into the result pile for all 29 measured networks. The net effect would be that the flaw would be in our "footprint" from which the measurements were taken. This footprint can only be a roughapproximationof end user distribution anyway. It would affect absolute valuesrelativeto zero, but the relative indexes between networks should not beaffected.Since we're looking at the relative relationship primarily, it wouldn't appear important. Jack Rickard ----------From: Stan Barber <sob () academ com> To: Justin W. Newton <justin () priori net>; Larry Vaden<vaden () texoma net>;Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>; nanog () merit eduSubject: Re: Internet Backbone Index Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 1:54 PM Justin writes:ObAboutTopic: This is possibly the most flawed study on the planet. Remind me to get a fast web server. (And to think, we were going toputour web server in our office, behind a T-1, instead of in realestatenearwhere the real bandwidth is that could be used for customers.).There are many studies more flawed. Consider some of the studies that the Tobacco Institute has released over the years about the affects of smoking. Concerning Internet performance, there have always been a variety ofwaysof measuring it. It all depends on what you are really trying tomeasure.The Keynote study is attempting to measure something to which theaverageInternet user (not engineers) can relate. However, There are alsoclearlythe possibility of artifacts in the data because of the testingmachine'sTCP stack or other issues (Vern Paxson has covered these issues atNANOGand IETF meetings over the last few years). Checking their web site,theirsoftware appears to run on top of the TCP stacks of many systems, sotheknown artifacts of some of these platforms could be an issue. -- Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob () academ com Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp:{mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sobBarber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed areonlymine.********************************************************* Justin W. Newton voice: +1-415-482-2840 Senior Network Architect fax: +1-415-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net Director At Large, ISP/C http://www.ispc.org "The People You Know. The People You Trust." *********************************************************
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Backbone Index, (continued)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index David P. Maynard (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Art Houle (Jun 28)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index David P. Maynard (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Stan Barber (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Justin W. Newton (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Stan Barber (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Sean Donelan (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Tim Flavin (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Scott Huddle (Jun 28)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Joe Shaw (Jun 28)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Jack Rickard (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Ben Black (Jun 27)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index William Allen Simpson (Jun 28)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Daniel W McRobb (Jun 28)
- Re: Internet Backbone Index Michael Dillon (Jun 30)