nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacBell
From: andrew khoo <andrewk () aussie net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 03:31:38 +1000 (EST)
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Nathan Stratton wrote:
YES, PACBell is MUCH more stable. PAIX is ok, but just not enough people there to be worth while
only problem is that we are *still* waiting for our PacBell connection at PAIX and it's been nearly 4.5 months now :) --- andrew khoo gsm: +61-416-161-234 speaks in home-grown tongue - ren sushi-eating good guy - wild wookie f*ck ya tongue, do the nose - paula
Current thread:
- PacBell J.D. Falk (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Nathan Stratton (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Stephen Stuart (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Jay Adelson (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Nathan Stratton (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell andrew khoo (Jun 25)
- Re: PacBell Jay Adelson (Jun 25)
- Re: PacBell Peter Kline (Jun 26)
- Re: PacBell Paul R.D. Lantinga (Jun 26)
- Re: PacBell Nathan Stratton (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PacBell Curt Howland (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell J.D. Falk (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Nathan Stratton (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Stephen Stuart (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell J.D. Falk (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Curt Howland (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Justin W. Newton (Jun 24)
- Re: PacBell Brett D. Watson (Jun 25)