nanog mailing list archives

RE: multihoming without BGP


From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 11:49:43 -0700





-----Original Message-----
From: Paul A Vixie [SMTP:paul () vix com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 11:35 AM
To:   nanog () merit edu
Subject:      Re: multihoming without BGP 

<snip>

The way I think of this is that BGP describes reachability, and
clients need
to know about topology in order to select the right web server, and
these two
(reachability and topology) are necessarily unrelated to each other.

I think that there is another important element or metric that is not
served by either - packet loss across the path. You know a server is
reachable - BGP tells you. If you know the topology, you know it is
"close". But looking at a typical day at MAE East, for example, when
you take into account the packets that end up being dropped, it may
*not* be the 'best' path. 


Rodney Joffe
Chief Technology Officer
Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company
http://www.genuity.net



Current thread: