nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSP ... New Information


From: Larry Vaden <vaden () texoma net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 1997 13:55:03 -0500

At 11:39 AM 6/9/97 PDT, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Larry,

Are you saying that a /19 wouldn't put less load on the _system_ than the
current situation + another block?

Our /23 and /21 are from UUNET, our primary provider.  ACSI is secondary
provider.

Teach me (read: offer your constructive criticism).  I'm willing to learn.


Load on the routing system could be reduced if you would take a block
of addresses from UUNET, and a block of addresses from ACSI, number
some of your customers out of the UUNET block, some of your customers
out of the ACSI block, and then use something along the lines of "auto
injection" (see draft-bates-multihoming-00.txt) to handle fallback
connectivity.

Yakov.

Yakov,

Thanks for the constructive input.  I'll try to locate the full URL and
we're interested in evaluating and following your suggestion.

Will this meet the InterNIC guidelines of "no favored connection"?

Regards,


Larry Vaden, founder and CEO               help-desk 903-813-4500
Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net> direct 903-870-0365
bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland   fax 903-868-8551
Member ISP/C, TISPA and USIPA                  pager 903-867-6571


Current thread: