nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP ... New Information
From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 19:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Should InterNIC grant small ISPs (this one serves a rural area between Dallas and Oklahoma City) fully routable and portable IP space? Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500
A long time ago, a group asked the same question. The answer turned out to be that the Internic, not being an ISP, has no clue about the routability of -any- prefix that is delegated. No delegation registry can ensure the routability of any given prefix. Thngs may have changed, can you describe to me what you consider a "fully routable and portable IP space" might look like and how such conditions might be enforced? -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: NSP ... New Information, (continued)
- Re: NSP ... New Information David Holub (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Jeremy Porter (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Jeremy Porter (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Edward Fang (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Joel Gallun (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bill Manning (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bill Manning (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Justin W. Newton (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bradley Dunn (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Daniel Senie (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 09)
- Message not available
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 09)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Randy Bush (Jun 09)