nanog mailing list archives
RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: "Gabriel M. Schuyler" <schuyler () vorpal net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 11:10:41 -0700
What's interesting to me is the few brave souls who are geographically dispersed corporations using their own WAN for multihoming. If you already have leased lines between your offices and each office has its own internet access through a local provider, you can protect against failures of the local providers by rerouting over the WAN leased-lines to another office and popping out on *their* local provider's link. Very cost effective, since you already are paying for the "backup link" anyways as part of your enterprise network. -- gabriel m schuyler, outlaw schuyler () vorpal net vorpal network - san francisco http://www.vorpal.net/
Current thread:
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?, (continued)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gordon Mercer (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? J.D. Falk (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gordon Mercer (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gabriel M. Schuyler (Jul 27)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? rbenn (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Kim Hubbard (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Dean Gaudet (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Matthew Silvey (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Tim Gibson (Jul 26)