nanog mailing list archives
RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: rbenn () clark net
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:
At 11:22 AM 7/24/97 -0400, root () gannett com wrote: I'm beginning to think there is a market for a device which has 1 Ethernet port and responds to any RANGE of addresses, so you can scam Internic into thinking you have 100% utilization of your address space, right off the bat...
You can hang over 4 million secondary addresses on E0. Just a thought. Randy Benn
Current thread:
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?, (continued)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? J.D. Falk (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gordon Mercer (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gabriel M. Schuyler (Jul 27)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? rbenn (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Kim Hubbard (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Dean Gaudet (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Matthew Silvey (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Tim Gibson (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)