nanog mailing list archives
Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom
From: "" <rbuchals () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 11:57:42 PDT
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org> What?! But wait, just a day ago, a UUNET engineer was going on about how ATM is good because it helps prevent failures at the IP
layer... That only works when there's enough reserve bandwidth out there in the ATM 'cloud' to reroute failed PVCs. You'd think that they would diversely route their ATM trunks. Maybe they turned auto-reroute off... -rb ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom, (continued)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Golan Ben-Oni (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nathan Stratton (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Dorian R. Kim (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nathan Stratton (Jul 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Dorian R. Kim (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Golan Ben-Oni (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Randy Bush (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nathan Stratton (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nathan Stratton (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Peter Giza (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nikos Mouat (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Barry Shein (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Charles Sprickman (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Dorian R. Kim (Jul 16)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Scott Yoneyama (Jul 17)
- Re: BOOM! there goes WorldCom Nathan Stratton (Jul 17)