Re: ATM vs. DS3

["William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson () greendragon com>]

> From: Josh Beck <jbeck () connectnet com>
> Now, the question is, what is the overhead of the serial (ppp?) protocol
> running over the T3? Since it is point to point, and not addressed, it
> should be less, or is this not the case?
The framing overhead for PPP over DS3 is about 7 bytes per packet.  You
can make it as few as 4 (PPP header compression) or as long as 10
(32-bit checksum).

I don't know anyone shipping PPP data compression yet at those speeds,
although I've heard of a project using multiple Stac LZS chips.

Anyway, you will get a lot better performance out of a PPP link than an
ATM link; certainly in the short term, and probably in the long term.

WSimpson () UMich edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
BSimpson () MorningStar com
    Key fingerprint =  2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3  59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2