nanog mailing list archives
Re: ATM vs. DS3
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 02:38:49 -0700
Karl Denninger <karl () Mcs Net> wrote:
My God, someone admits it?
I've used 20% as the general ATM overhead now for almost two years, and have been poo-pooed by lots of people claiming that it wasn't anywhere near that bad.
Now, now, that was beaten to death at many lists including NANOG. What have you been, hybernating? The ATM overhead depends a lot on small things like if you use SNAP or not, etc. --vadim
Current thread:
- ATM vs. DS3 Josh Beck (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Ehud Gavron (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ATM vs. DS3 Chris A. Icide (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Karl Denninger (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Ben Black (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Stephen Balbach (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Peter Kline (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Eric D. Madison (Jul 10)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Karl Denninger (Jul 09)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Alex.Bligh (Jul 11)
- Re: ATM vs. DS3 Dorian R. Kim (Jul 11)
- RE: ATM vs. DS3 Stephen Balbach (Jul 10)
- RE: ATM vs. DS3 Eric D. Madison (Jul 10)