nanog mailing list archives

Re: ATM vs. DS3


From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 02:38:49 -0700

Karl Denninger  <karl () Mcs Net> wrote:

My God, someone admits it?

I've used 20% as the general ATM overhead now for almost two years, and have
been poo-pooed by lots of people claiming that it wasn't anywhere near that
bad.

Now, now, that was beaten to death at many lists including NANOG.
What have you been, hybernating?

The ATM overhead depends a lot on small things like if you use SNAP
or not, etc.

--vadim


Current thread: