nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 13:56:44 -0500 (EST)
As a customer I have no problem paying for /16s so long as you'll give me as many as I wish to buy. -- Eliot Lear [lear () sgi com]
That's not what's being talked about - unless the members of the new entity feel that it should be done, which I seriously doubt. What *might* happen is that any new ISP with $5k could get an independent /19 from the registry from day 1 and not have to play the renumbering game. Again, it'd depend on what people agreed to - the members, but also IANA... The new registry will still be under IANA :) But for now, it appears that the new registry will be subjecting people to the same requirements as the old registry... Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Non-profit IP Registry Kim Hubbard (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Michael Dillon (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Dorian R. Kim (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Eliot Lear (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Avi Freedman (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Kim Hubbard (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Todd R. Stroup (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul R.D. Lantinga (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Bob Collie (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Eric D. Madison (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David Stoddard (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David Schwartz (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David R. Conrad (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Michael Dillon (Jan 02)