nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses
From: Matt Ranney <mjr () ranney com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 01:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Barry Shein writes...
[...]
3. In order for an email message to pass over port 52 it must have a header which reads: X-SPAM-CHARTER: This message conforms to the SPAM Charter or similar (X-PUCE-CHARTER:). Otherwise, it's just dropped on the floor. Remember that this is the new port. 4. Abuse of that header is a litigable trademark violation (we get this set up with lawyers, but akin to DC comics or the Good Housekeeping Seal.)
[...] You can trademark the use of a TCP port? Are you sure? If so, what a keen idea this might be. Either that, or its really scary. I'm not sure which. -- Matt Ranney - mjr () ranney com This is how I sign all my messages. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses, (continued)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Vern Paxson (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Tony Li (Jan 14)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Peter Cole (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Peter Cole (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Kent W. England (Jan 14)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Sean Donelan (Jan 15)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Chris A. Icide (Jan 15)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Barry Shein (Jan 15)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Barry Shein (Jan 15)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Matt Ranney (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Barry Shein (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Matt Ranney (Jan 16)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Matthew Gering (Jan 15)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Barry Shein (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Avi Freedman (Jan 16)
- RE: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Barry Shein (Jan 16)
- Re: Questions about Internet Packet Losses Vern Paxson (Jan 14)