nanog mailing list archives

Re: F means filtered ?


From: Racer X <shagboy () world std com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 00:18:57 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, George Herbert wrote:

It's not like failing to reach f.root-servers.net will deny service
to anyone (you try g, h, a, b... if you can't get through).
If this were more widely deployed to more of them that might
be cause for some complaint by the spammers that they were
being discriminated against.  But one of the 15 or so being
unavailable to... let's see, counting it up it looks like around
12 class C sized nets and 4 individual host machines is barely a
statistical blip.  In the worst case, DNS lookups at those sites
take twice as long in 1 in 15 cases, and much less in practice
if their lookup software has any brains and stops querrying
roots it doesn't get responses from.

Sigh.. the point is that we have 9 (or so) root servers right now.  All of
those can be counted on to provide name service for anybody for anything,
assuming of course that the network is okay.  When someone starts blocking
certain sites' access, then we basically have 8 servers.  Sooner or later,
someone else will decide to start blocking.  Then we'll have 7.  And so
on, until everyone has to use different root servers.

If you claim to be a root server with data for everyone, you should damn
well provide that data to everyone.  Otherwise, you have no right to pose
as one of the root servers.

shag

Judd Bourgeois          PGP key ID 0xEDC21CA1
shagboy () world std com   25DDE4AF C5AFEF51 6905DC77 360F0387
To all my friends - It's not the end
The earth has not swallowed me yet - 311, "Freak Out"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: