nanog mailing list archives
Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 23:59:20 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 17 Feb 1997, David Holub wrote:
A broad FCC interpretation of the 'Act' with regard to regulations concerning what 'Interconnection' is among 'Carriers' could be of operational benefit to many on this list and we need to make that clear to our future regulators.
You really should go to http://www.fcc.gov and read some of Reed Hundt's speeches concerning the Internet. You are headed 180 degrees opposite of where the FCC is currently headed. And this discussion really does belong on com-priv () lists psi com where FCC issues are regularly discussed. Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-250-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael () memra com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff Tim Salo (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff David Holub (Feb 17)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff Michael Dillon (Feb 18)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff David Holub (Feb 18)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff Michael Dillon (Feb 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff Tim Salo (Feb 18)
- Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor - this is not simply about RBOC ISP Tariff David Holub (Feb 17)