nanog mailing list archives

Re: Alpha test of MAE filtering capability


From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:21:01 -0800

At 08:14 PM 30-01-97 -0600, Sean Donelan wrote:
But any reasonable ISP realizes that by using the RADB servers is wonderful,
but does not come close to preventing an:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <innocent ISP>

Nor can the route servers tell when someone/something blocks packets
down at the layer 2 level.  Since the route servers are now being paid
by the exchange point operators, maybe there is a chance the two could
be coordinated.  Or at least checked for conflicts?

-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
 Affiliation given for identification not representation


That is already an issue at the ATM NAPs, since traffic can't flow until PVCs
are set-up between consenting peers. And we have had some problems in this
area.

So I think the answer is "Yes".

--Kent


~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
Kent W. England                                     Six Sigma Networks
1655 Landquist Drive, Suite 100              Voice/Fax:   619.632.8400
Encinitas, CA  92024                                kwe () 6SigmaNets com
   Technical Expertise for PacBell NAP and PacBell Internet Services

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: