nanog mailing list archives
Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 15:41:25 -0400
Geoff White writes:
I'd like you to point out the major corporations and public universities who will do this. I'd also like you to immediately return that nice root server that NSI has paid for in part or whole, if you really believe this. Anyone trying to take "COM" and point it somewhere else will find that they have created a class-action lawsuit with 1,000,000 plaintiffs -- all the people who you instantly disconnect that have COM domains. Anyone trying to STEAL NSI's COM zone (to appropriate it as their own) will likely find themselves on the wrong end of a monstrous lawsuit, not to mention potential felony theft charges.NSI does not own the root domain .com .org .net or any other TLD. They were *hired* by the NSF to manage the registration of domain names for these TLDs, and they have done a deplorable job.
You are, of course, correct. I will point out that NSI's cooperative agreement with the NSF clearly states that at the end of the agreement, any and all databases or software created under the agreement belong to the government, not to NSI. Read it for yourself if you don't believe me. Perry Speaking for myself, and not in an official capacity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...), (continued)
- Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Michael Dillon (Apr 24)
- Re: Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Lee Howard (Apr 24)
- Re: Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Russell Byrne (Apr 24)
- Re: Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Robert Mathews (Apr 24)
- offtopic for NANOG - do not read Paul A Vixie (Apr 25)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Karl Denninger (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Geoff White (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Karl Denninger (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Dave Crocker (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Vince Wolodkin (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Vince Wolodkin (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Marten Terpstra (Apr 27)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Jeff Williams (Apr 27)
- Re: Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Lee Howard (Apr 24)
- Mixed analogies - was(Network Solutions Dropped...) Michael Dillon (Apr 24)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Mike Trest (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Dave Crocker (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Paul A Vixie (Apr 26)