nanog mailing list archives

Re: router syn/syn-ack/ack alarming...


From: "Jeff Young" <young () mci net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 21:57:23 -0400

i think that they're talking about shutting down the source,
not the destination.  if you deploy it on your own incoming
interface, well, gun - foot - bang :-)

Jeff Young
young () mci net

From: Regis Donovan <regisdo () microsoft com>
To: "'nanog () merit edu'" <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: router syn/syn-ack/ack alarming...
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 13:23:35 -0700
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.24
Encoding: 13 TEXT
Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 522

um... maybe i'm missing the clue here, but if the router vendors add
something that shuts down an interface if the SYN/SYN-ACK/ACK ratio
becomes too bad make it *easier* for me if i'm doing a denial of service
attack on a host?  

instead of denying service to a given host, all i have to do is drive
the router into alarm mode so it shuts off the interface and then i get
to deny service to an entire segment and everything downstream from that
segment...

here's to better bang for your cracker-kiddie buck...
--regis


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: