nanog mailing list archives
Re: customers and web servers and level one naps
From: dgaudet () hotwired com (Dean Gaudet)
Date: 7 Sep 1996 02:01:36 GMT
In article <hot.mailing-lists.nanog-199609051951.PAA08990 () netaxs com>, Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com> wrote:
The bigger problem (the one I was thinking about) would be someone putting a host on 192.41.177.x or 192.157.69.x or 198.32.136.x or ...
With something like cisco's Local Director you could quite easily serve a whole web farm out of a single IP. Well, at least when HTTP/1.1 style Host: or full-url GET type requests become more prevalent, otherwise you'd be stuck with a single virtual host. Technically it's a router :) Dean - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps, (continued)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Sep 11)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Jim J. Steinhard (Sep 12)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Curtis Villamizar (Sep 12)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Alexis Rosen (Sep 13)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Stephen Stuart (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Paul A Vixie (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Avi Freedman (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Dean Gaudet (Sep 06)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Gordon Cook (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Avi Freedman (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps bmanning (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Avi Freedman (Sep 05)
- Re: customers and web servers and level one naps Robert Mathews-ICICX (Sep 05)