nanog mailing list archives
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
From: Guy T Almes <almes () advanced org>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 10:20:41 -0400
Paul, The relevant BMWG work here is within the IPPM effort. The email list is ippm () advanced org with the unsurprising ippm-request () advanced org to join/unjoin. -- Guy At 01:29 PM 8/31/96 -0400, Paul Ferguson wrote:
At 01:11 PM 8/30/96 PDT, Randy Bush wrote:Analysis of Actual End to End Performance accross the NAPs/MAEsAn excellent topic, to be sure, but how do you propose that this be measured?And there's a subject for a NANOG panel in itself. I can think of some interesting experiments that would involve cooperation of multiple peers. But there are folk far better based in measurment than I who might suggest some fun stuff. Guy, Steve, ..., this is your cue. randy... And it might even be nice for someone who is active in the IETF Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) to participate. [ref: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/bmwg-charter.html] - paul
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Guy T Almes (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Sep 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Guy T Almes (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Sean Doran (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG John Hawkinson (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Sep 03)
- RE: Agenda for next NANOG Peter Ford (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG bmanning (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG John Hawkinson (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Avi Freedman (Sep 04)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG bmanning (Sep 03)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Craig Labovitz (Sep 04)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Sep 04)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Brett D. Watson (Sep 05)