nanog mailing list archives

Re: RE: You are right [was Re: Ungodly packet loss rates]


From: edd () acm org
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 15:27:23 +0400 (AMT)

  ISPs.  They do this for routers, bridges, FR services so they can
  probably find a respectable consulting/measurement group to  collect
Yes, they do. It would be better (sometimes) if they did not -:)

When I read their comparations I sometimes think to drom all my hardware
(BAD in terms of this magasines) and bue new one (Bay Networks as BB routers,
FORE ATM as ATM
, etc...). Through it's strange idea (for example) to compare
hight-end Bay router with CS7200 (middle-range router), or to
compare middle-range Lt1010 with Cascade back-bone ATM switchs.
And I am afraid thy would use the same technik for ISP comparation.

Well, besides being interesting ISP comparison *may* not be as objective and
informative as we'd like to. In addition, what technique do you propose for 
such comparison? Just asking customers aren't enough, IMHO. And you can't
count *every* ISP, even in the US... 

My 2c,


Edgar


--
Edgar V.S. Der-Danieliantz      Armenia Network Information Center
hostmaster () amnic net         Azatootianne 1, Yerevan, Armenia

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: