Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II

[Sanjay Dani(maillists) <indus () professionals com>]

> From: swolff () cisco com (Stephen Wolff)
> Subject: Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II

> *Whenever* there is public funding of *any* activity, an AUP is attached to
> oulaw the misuse of taxpayer money.  Internet II is not exempt.

I see in today's SF Chronicle that Cisco is one of the promoters
of the Internet-II project along with Stanford, other universities
and companies. Perhaps you could start by convincing Cisco mgmt
and save cisco shareholders' money.

> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 12:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () bifrost seastrom com>

> Would it be impolite to point out that if a $100M R&D effort would
> create the technology for a 2-3 order of magnitude speed-up, that the
> private sector would be falling all over themselves right this second
> to make it happen?

Unrelated but see above the support of Cisco, Sprint etc.

The same article quoted someone at EFF that there is no need
for a new Internet as the current one can be made faster by using
cable modems. Hmmm..

Sanjay.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -