nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet II is coming...
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 14:28:47 -0700
Sean Doran <smd () cesium clock org> wrote:
Moreover, you will note that lightweight private lines is not something that can be done only by ATM...
It can be done with IPv4 as-is. Build an IP-in-IP tunnel. Have the gateways doing encapsulation to slap higher priority on the packets, so there won't be any loss. Place a rate limitation on traffic entering the tunnel. Much better than CBR SVC in many ways. I know of at least one company which plans to offer that kind of functionality, at wire speed :) --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Internet II is coming..., (continued)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Sean Doran (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Stephen Balbach (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Kent W. England (Oct 10)
- RE: Internet II is coming... Jim Browning (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 11)
- RE: Internet II is coming... Sean Doran (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Tim Salo (Oct 10)
- Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Bill Manning (Oct 10)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Michael Dillon (Oct 10)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II bmanning (Oct 11)
- Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Bill Manning (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Sean Doran (Oct 10)
- RE: Internet II is coming... Vadim Antonov (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Vadim Antonov (Oct 10)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Paul Ferguson (Oct 10)
- RE: Internet II is coming... Jim Browning (Oct 11)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Tim Salo (Oct 14)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Fletcher E Kittredge (Oct 14)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Peter Lothberg (Oct 17)
- Re: Internet II is coming... Alex.Bligh (Oct 17)