nanog mailing list archives
RE: TCP SYN attacks
From: Ted Linnenkamp <tedlin () microsoft com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 15:56:47 -0700
---------- From: Tim Bass[SMTP:bass () linux silkroad com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 1996 7:58 AM To: freedman () netaxs com Cc: nanog () merit edu; iepg () iepg org Subject: Re: TCP SYN attacksMy preferred approach is to not even have to store state on any of the embryonic connections. And to implement the fix on all of my hosts. And customers can implement it in a firewall, if they choose (and have boxes which can't be fixed: Win95, NT, Macs, ...). Avi
Avi, Did you mean to state that these boxes can't be fixed (hardened against SYN attacks) by you? Ted L. My statements are my own and not of the Microsoft Corp.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: TCP SYN attacks, (continued)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Dima Volodin (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Tom Perrine (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Avi Freedman (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Dima Volodin (Oct 04)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Avi Freedman (Oct 04)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Tim Bass (Oct 04)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Dima Volodin (Oct 04)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Tom Perrine (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Dima Volodin (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Alexis Rosen (Oct 03)
- Re: TCP SYN attacks Avi Freedman (Oct 04)