nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering is a lot of work.
From: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 16:24:48 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:10:26 -0500 To: "Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com>, Robert Laughlin <robert () portal dx net> From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin () erols com> Subject: Re: Peering is a lot of work. [...] One can point default at someone whether or not they are peering with the person. I am somewhat confused by the thought that people believe that they need to be peering with someone to have that person point default at them. I could (I don't, but I could), point default at /anyone/ on the same switch fabric as me, whether they are peering with me or not. Why do people continue to tie these 2 issues together? [...]
Unless, of course, you are using ATM for your NAP or interconnect medium. -tjs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Peering is a lot of work. Kent W. England (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Justin W. Newton (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Bradley Dunn (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Doug Sheppard (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Jon Zeeff (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Noam Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Warren Williams (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Tim Salo (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Kent W. England (Oct 29)