nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering is a lot of work.
From: doug () pbi net (Doug Sheppard)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:05:53 -0800
On Oct 29, 15:10, Justin W. Newton wrote:
One can point default at someone whether or not they are peering with the person. I am somewhat confused by the thought that people believe that they need to be peering with someone to have that person point default at them. I could (I don't, but I could), point default at /anyone/ on the same switch fabric as me, whether they are peering with me or not. Why do people continue to tie these 2 issues together?
At the PacBell Nap for instance, you *couldn't* just point default at anyone on the same switch fabric -- because you need to set up a peering (mapping) within the switching fabric first, before you do any route peering. Until this happens there would be no unwanted traffic. -d - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Peering is a lot of work. Kent W. England (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Justin W. Newton (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Bradley Dunn (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Doug Sheppard (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Jon Zeeff (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Noam Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Warren Williams (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Tim Salo (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering is a lot of work. Kent W. England (Oct 29)