nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Cidr Report

From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 21:41:16 -0500

Hey, this looks pretty good. Let's hope the trend continues (if, in fact,
there *is* a trend).

- paul

At 12:00 PM 11/29/96 -0800, Tony Bates wrote:


Date   Prefixes
231196 40687
241196 40908
251196 40844
261196 41043
271196 41074
281196 39803
291196 39735


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

Re: 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report), (continued)
- - - Re: 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report) alex (Nov 17)
- Re: The Cidr Report Scott Huddle (Nov 15)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 15)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 15)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 22)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Steve Kann (Nov 22)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report William Allen Simpson (Nov 23)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 26)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 29)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 30)
    - Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 29)
  - Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Brett D. Watson (Nov 29)