nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 21:06:17 -0500
Maybe the 'Hall of Shame' approach *does* work after all. ;-) - paul At 12:25 PM 11/23/96 PST, Randy Bush wrote:
Date Prefixes 171196 40844 171196 40868 181196 40933 191196 42076 201196 40674 211196 40583 221196 40525Tony, I suspect that you and your weekly report are, in a large part, responsible for this. I thank you. Our routers thank you. Frank, if you're out there, has the curve changed since Tony started publishing again? randy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report, (continued)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 08)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 15)
- 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report) Marc Roger (Nov 17)
- Re: 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report) alex (Nov 17)
- 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report) Marc Roger (Nov 17)
- Re: The Cidr Report Scott Huddle (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 22)
- Re: The Cidr Report Steve Kann (Nov 22)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report William Allen Simpson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 26)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)