nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd)
From: Bradley Dunn <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 21:45:43 -0500 ()
On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Snowdog wrote:
I do not know of any organization that would allow internal network information to be made available to an outside party. I think this ranks pretty high up on any security policy. It would probably not even be possible on correctly secured network. And on one that wasn't properly secured, you would probably hear lots of complaints about scanning or searching that network.
If the internal network is that "top secret" it should be behind a firewall and using RFC 1918 space. -BD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd), (continued)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 19)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Ed Jackson (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Bill Woodcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) David R. Conrad (Nov 21)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Justin W. Newton (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Avi Freedman (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Snowdog (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Bradley Dunn (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Justin W. Newton (Nov 20)
- RE: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) Jim Fleming (Nov 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy (fwd) William Allen Simpson (Nov 21)