nanog mailing list archives
Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI)
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 04:19:53 -0000
| Doesn't the fact that they recover the investment mean that enough | people wanted the product and were willing to pay for it? Well, I dunno, it could also mean that an organization with enormously successful marketing skills was able to make hay out of an alternative that makes heedless yompers pay excessively for often really unsuitable machinery. No? Sean. (looking for better suggestions for a 'y' word)
Current thread:
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI), (continued)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Curtis Villamizar (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Fletcher Kittredge (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Steve Steinberg (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Larry J. Plato (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)
- RE: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 29)
- RE: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)