nanog mailing list archives
Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI)
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 23:29:43 -0000
Someone suggested to me that it's because so much money has
been spent on developing the technology that it HAS to be
used in order to recover the investment.
This may be somewhat apocryphal, but it's eminently
believable.
Sean.
Current thread:
- SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Bharat Ranjan (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 26)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul A Vixie (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Mike Trest (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Per Gregers Bilse (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Dorian Kim (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Curtis Villamizar (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)