nanog mailing list archives
Re: mae-west congestion
From: booloo () cats ucsc edu (Mark Boolootian)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 17:20:50 -0800 (PST)
What I don't understand is why that has _stayed_ saturated... it seems to me that some of the big players would have rerouted their traffic by now to avoid subjecting it to this, which would also have the side effect of causing the problem to, at least for the short term, go away.
I'm interested in knowing what happened between March 6 and March 7 on the Ames FDDI ring. That's when the utilization jumped from around 60% to 90%. Also of interest is that it appears MFS stopped collecting stats late in the afternoon, with utilization around 60%, on the 6th, and didn't start collecting again until around noon on the 7th, at which time utilization is running at 90%. Anyone know what happened? mb -- Mark Boolootian <booloo () cats ucsc edu> (aka booloo () scruznet com)
Current thread:
- mae-west congestion Matthew Kaufman (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Kevin Oberman (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Stephen Stuart (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Mark Boolootian (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Jonathan Heiliger (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Peter Kaminski (Mar 21)
- Re: mae-west congestion Nikos Mouat (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mae-west congestion Lance Tatman (Mar 22)
- Re: mae-west congestion Kevin Oberman (Mar 21)