nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:23:22 -0500 (EST)
I can't speak for Matthew, but many smallish ISPs have legacy /24 allocations from using Livingston Portmasters and IRXes before they could do CIDR (I *think* they solved that problem, but I don't know for sure). -george
I think the problem was with variable-sized subnets within a /24, not with subnetting at all, but I could be wrong. Avi
Current thread:
- The World Responds to a Non Announcement, (continued)
- The World Responds to a Non Announcement Alan Hannan (Jan 26)
- Re: The World Responds to a Non Announcement Henry Clark (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Matthew Kaufman (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dorian Kim (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dorian Kim (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Alan Hannan (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dorian Kim (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 26)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Avi Freedman (Jan 26)
- cidr & livingston (was Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations) Russ Pagenkopf (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations bmanning (Jan 30)
- Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations David R. Conrad (Jan 27)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Forrest W. Christian (Jan 27)