nanog mailing list archives

Re: PacBell NAP and Co-location


From: "Warren K. Williams" <wkwilli () PacBell COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 23:11:08 -0800

Pushpendra Mohta wrote:
Does the arrangement you mention still require that Pacific Bell
retain ownership of the equipment that is placed at the Pacific Bell
site ?

No, it does not. 

Is a draft online somewhere ?

No, we have not as yet drafted a contract for customers. I frankly wasn't
certain as to the demand for colocation. I knew that it had been a bone of
contention for working with Pacific Bell in the past, and as a result worked
with various parties here to resolve the issue. As soon as I hear from a
serious customer requesting a co-located solution as part of their
attachment to the NAP, I'll pull together what is needed from a contractual
standpoint, and put a draft on the web. We have the physical arrangements
made and reserved, if you will, in case there is a true demand. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Warren K. Williams, Director - NAP Project Management
        Pacific Bell Business Communications Services
      Email: wkwilli () pacbell com   Phone: 510.867.9065  
-------------------------------------------------------------------



Current thread: