nanog mailing list archives
Re: value of co-location
From: "Warren K. Williams" <wkwilli () PacBell COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 23:03:12 -0800
Paul Vixie wrote:
I know that after years of trauma and chaos and delay, we now have a couple of NAPs implemented on an ATM mesh. If I ever see an ATM NAP come online with dozens of 155Mb/s members and no chaos, trauma or delay, I promise to post a full apologia here.
I'll be looking forward to that post :-) Seriously though, Paul, the new platform (the Stratacom BPX) going in place here at Pacific Bell will be a test to the concerns you raise, if indeed we can bring online the PacBell NAP "with dozens of 155Mb/s members and no chaos, trauma or delay". I believe this will be the test of the hypothesis that the combination of properly engineered access line buffering, backplane speeds and congestion management capabilities can alleviate the "good put" problems previously experienced by IP over ATM implementations. We have quite a bit of date for the DS3 level that we will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG meeting, and we will certainly be compiling data on the OC3 testing as well (which, BTW, we will make public as soon as the data compilation is complete.) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Warren K. Williams, Director - NAP Project Management Pacific Bell Business Communications Services Email: wkwilli () pacbell com Phone: 510.867.9065 -------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: value of co-location, (continued)
- Re: value of co-location Kent W. England (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Stephen Balbach (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Paul A Vixie (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Russ Pagenkopf (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Stephen Balbach (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Shikhar Bajaj (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Dorian Kim (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location postel (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Mike O'Dell (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location George H. Clapp (Jan 19)
- Re: value of co-location Andrew Partan (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Warren K. Williams (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Paul Ferguson (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Dave Siegel (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Nathan Stratton (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Kent W. England (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Hans-Werner Braun (Jan 20)
- Re: value of co-location Mike O'Dell (Jan 21)
- Re: value of co-location Joseph Lawrence (Jan 22)
- Re: value of co-location Bilal Chinoy (Jan 22)
- Re: value of co-location Stephen Stuart (Jan 22)
- Re: value of co-location Dennis Ferguson (Jan 21)
- Re: value of co-location Kent W. England (Jan 19)