nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)

From: jon () branch com (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 12:18:41 -0500 (EST)

purposes of aggregation. If there is no sanity in address allocation,
we cannot solve the problem.


Let's not forget that the problem is poor router/protocol design and that
it can be solved.  CIDR is a band-aid.

Current thread:

Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be), (continued)
- - - Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) Alan B. Clegg (Feb 15)
    - Re: Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) Michael Dillon (Feb 15)
    - Re: Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) mike (Feb 16)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Feb 16)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Simon Chan (Feb 13)
  - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) David Kovar (Feb 13)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) bmanning (Feb 14)
  - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Jonathan Heiliger (Feb 13)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Michael Dillon (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
  - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Jon Zeeff (Feb 13)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Dorian Kim (Feb 13)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) elliot (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
  - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) bmanning (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Kai (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Sean Donelan (Feb 17)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Walter O. Haas (Feb 20)
  - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Scott Mace (Feb 20)
    - Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Dave Siegel (Feb 21)

(Thread continues...)